HTML

konyhatündér

Az angol nyelvű bejegyzések a Budapest Business Journal kétheti üzleti magazinban jelentek meg. A magyar nyelvűek kimondottan a blogra készültek. – English posts are reprints of the column in the Budapest Business Journal, a biweekly English-language business magazine about Hungary. Posts in Hungarian were written for this blog.

Friss topikok

Linkblog

Generations of people with stuffy noses and scratchy throats have been fed chicken soup as a cold remedy. But is there any science behind it, or is chicken soup simply the ultimate comfort food?

I may have an abiding fascination for food of all kinds, but deep down, I am a science girl. For example, I have never had much patience for the idea of food as a folk remedy. I am sure honey and garlic do have antimicrobial properties, (and they scare away vampires, too!) but I am pretty certain that they only cure colds the way the resveratrol in your evening glass of red wine makes you live longer or a butterfly stirs up a wind. It is all very scientific and true, just infinitesimal in scope. So whenever my mother told me she would cook chicken soup for my cold, I made polite noncommittal sounds and reached for the ColdRex. I love my meat stock like any other person, but it actually took an interesting tidbit of science to make me willing to try it instead of my usual cocktail of paracetamol (for the aches), caffeine (for energy), Vitamin C (better late than never) and fluids (against dehydration).

Aching for gelatine
It turns out that infection, and especially fever, makes you need more protein. A healthy adult of my weight (54 kg) requires about 43 grams of protein per day. However, in stress or illness, you would need twice as much, since your immune response would dictate more protein synthesis and use up amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) as fuel. And here comes the chicken soup: a good consommé can be up to 10% protein due to the gelatine leached from the bones, skin and meat, meaning that a big bowl of it could contain up to 50 grams – all of the additional protein required by your cold. (Trivia: most proteins in cooking congeal like egg whites. Gelatine is one of the very few that disperse in water if treated well, which allows stocks to be translucent, fluid food.)
Actually, to be honest, the protein angle is just me putting two and two together. To my knowledge, no scientist has ever tested this theory and it might be complete baloney.

Lab tests
However, some aspects of chicken soup have been examined in a lab. In 1978, Mount Sinai researchers in Miami looked at how chicken soup affected air flow and mucus in the noses of 15 volunteers who drank cold water, hot water or chicken soup. Both hot fluids helped increase the movement of nasal mucus, but chicken soup did a better job than the hot water.
In 2000, a sage of Omaha called Stephen Rennard made volunteers eat his wife’s soup and then drew their blood. He found that the soup inhibited the movement of neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell. Dr. Rennard theorized that by inhibiting the migration of these infection-fighting cells in the body, chicken soup helps reduce upper respiratory cold symptoms. (Further explanation: as you might know, when we feel ill, we are actually feeling our immune system at work. Its primal – and most primitive – defense is to cause inflammation, thus burning out microbes. However, evolution has provided more sophisticated immunological mechanisms such as antibody-based responses that target specific bugs. In most cases, these work just as well, while inflammation tends to go into overkill, which means that uncomfortable inflammation or fever can be reduced without hindering your body’s defense capabilities.)
Chicken skin also contains the amino acid cysteine, an important building block of acetylcysteine, a medication prescribed for bronchitis. Chicken cysteine-rich proteins are extensively studied by immunologists, as a matter of fact.

Vegetable chorus
And all this is just the chicken, and we haven’t even started on the vegetables yet. Onions contain antihistamines that also reduce inflammation. Carrots are full of betacarotene, which is turned into immuno-hero Vitamin A. Parsnips bring Vitamin E, salt gets you the electrolytes needed for good fluid regulation. Black pepper (and the heat of the soup, of course) makes you sweat, which, as any doctor will tell you, is also an important part of ridding yourself of pesky rhinoviruses (cold) or influenza-A (flu).
It took a lot of research to make me even consider food as medicine. But what eventually convinced me that chicken soup is a lot better (if not less expensive) than the pills, was the empirical evidence: I felt better after a bowl of soup than after a mug of hot ColdRex.

So this flu season, why don’t you conduct your own tests?
 

Címkék: csirke répa hagyma zselatin húsleves

Szólj hozzá!

 

If you never revisit restaurants that you have caught serving you limp carrots straight from the microwave or a rage-stirring “Mexican mix” of carrots, corn and green peas and green beans, you are absolutely right. But don’t hate the freezer for it. The freezer is your friend.

 

It is sometimes a dangerous friend, to be sure. Large ice crystals can puncture cell walls in your food and cause odd chemical reactions because they concentrate the stuff that is usually dissolved in water, leaving rancid flavors, browned skins. Also, he is a friend that not all of your other friends will like (see table below). It is not perfect.

But, oh how accommodating and understanding he can be.

If you have a nice juicy bit of bone or some skin that you have picked off an unsuspecting chicken breast that you would have thrown away, you can just collect it in the freezer until you have enough to make a good consommé. If you make a batch of polenta for grilling (which takes 45 minutes), you can just let it set, cut it up, and freeze it until you need it, and have grilled polenta in 5. The same goes for a pate brisée or a pie crust dough. You will never run out of toast bread or croissants or fresh rolls warm out of the oven.

And then there is the stuff that you are bored with now, but will be really happy to have in a couple of weeks. Half of a shockingly sweet dried-plum studded chocolate fruitcake. That Moroccan meat tagine that you made too much of. Cookies that you don’t have to consume in one sitting. A chicken leg left from a grilled chicken. That meat stock that you made from the bits in the freezer and the carcass of the grilled chicken, which you will now be able to use instead of chicken stock cubes for a quick creamed soup.

You can also use him to improve some of your dishes. Even the best restaurants freeze chocolate soufflés before baking to achieve that lovely runny center of hot chocolate heaven. Frozen chili con carne is even better than fresh. Freezing is also used to distill alcohol while keeping more of the fruit’s original taste than the usual cooking process, or curing meat.

You can freeze leftovers, half-prepared ingredients, sauces, eggs, meat cuts, pasta, home-made TV-dinners, in other words, almost everything – with the proper technique.

There are actually very few tricks you need to know. Always freeze as fast as you can to avoid the formation of large crystals that are more likely to puncture cell walls and leech away the tasty stuff. Freeze without any covering, on a plate, then put into plastic bags or containers (unless the stuff is liquid, of course) or wrap in clingfoil. Blanch vegetables before freezing. Defrost in a bath of cold water, if possible, hot water, if not, and use the microwave oven only as the last resort. Think of how you will use what you freeze and form batches accordingly. And always, always use up the frozen stuff as fast as you can.

So if you just keep his boundaries in mind, trust him with your secrets, and make some compromises and take the bad with the good, your friendship with the big cold guy in the kitchen will bring you much culinary joy and comfort. Just like human-human friendships.

 

6 things no-one should ever freeze

  • mayonnaise and other fat-based emulsions such as hollandaise
  • potatoes they turn into a pasty mush, yuck
  • cream it separates into buttery clumps of fat, unless frozen whipped
  • salad greens anything you eat raw or lightly steamed loses all crunchiness
  • fruits usually turn into a pulp in home freezers, so only freeze them if you will cook or bake them anyway.
  •  

  • risotto rice

 

 

Szólj hozzá!

If humans were as ethical as we like to think we are, we would all be vegetarians. As science increasingly confirms that animals have reason, a sense of justice, they lie if the situation requires it, use tools and form cultures, it is more and more difficult to justify why it is all right to eat beings so fundamentally similar to us. And yes, that includes birds, too, not just pigs, horses and dogs (a somewhat stupider variety of the latter are raised for food by the Chinese).
If we are honest, the only reason we continue to eat meat is, well, we just like it too much to give it up.
However, we may have to. A rising population and higher living standards mean that, according to UN estimates, our take-up of meat will rise about 70% by 2050. The bad news is that we could not meet such demand even if we turned all of Earth’s farmland into pastures. And even it livestock could be increased, greenhouse gas emissions would be much much higher, as currently 18% of all emissions is connected to making meat for hungry humans.
So things will have to drastically change in the next 40 or so years for economic and environmental reasons as well, not just the sentimental stuff. (For more on how farming is changing and how that is affecting our food, please see the previous issue of Konyhatündér.) We will either have to eat less than the 26 kg of meat per year that we do today, make raising animals cheaper, somehow make meat production independent of farming, or enlist other sources of protein.
It seems that the future of meat holds all of the above. Novel technologies such as cloning more “efficient” stock for breeding (for about $15,000) might be disturbing, but that will probably fade over the decades as “normal” meat grows more and more expensive. However, cloning cannot satisfy humanity’s hunger for meat sustainably because cloned animals still need to feed.
Alternative protein-sources or “vegetarian meat” such as tofu and soya meat already have a lot of supporters (not me). Now these are joined in the West by a number of new alternatives from Far East cuisines. An example is the Buddhist staple seitan, which emulates duck meat. (It is actually processed wheat gluten which is fried, steamed or baked.) Tempeh, a soybean cake from Indonesia, is made of cooked soybeans held together by the mycelia of a fungus, and it can be cooked, fried, baked, grated, and marinated or brined.
Technology firms are also baking up new alternatives. One is quorn, which is basically bits of an edible mould bound together by egg whites. It was invented by a British company, Marlow Foods, in the sixties, when it was widely thought that there would be a famine in the eighties due to population growth. It has so far not been widely accepted outside the UK, where it has a 60% share of the meat replacement market. Another company, Dutch Meatless BV has invented vegetarian meat made of lupine and wheat fibers. Eggs, especially egg whites in industrial processes are also being replaced.
One of the most interesting technological developments in meat replacement is growing meat in labs. A few cells are taken from live animals, then introduced into a culture media, where they replicate, forming tissue. All it needs is a tad of genetic manipulation, some nutrients to make it grow, and voilá, a sausage. Making complex meat such as a steak is difficult though, as it is made of muscle tissue threaded through with long, fine capillaries to the cells. In order to get a good steak, you would also need fat threaded through the muscle, which is “exercised” through fluctuations in temperature, which make the muscle contract or expand.
At this point, no-one is really talking about how these alternatives might taste, so I presume that the answer is: initially, at least, not as good as “real” food. However, if eating cultured chicken nuggets is a viable alternative to killing, paying a bundle, and threatening the climate, many of us will find it more difficult to convince ourselves that eating real chicken is worth it.

Szólj hozzá!

 

For the foodie of the 20th century, the end always justifies the means. If that duck needs to be force-fed to make its liver swell up with tasty fat, so be it (poor duck). If a kilogram of steak takes 25,000 liters of water to “make”, just add it to the bill and trust the market to make people buy less of it (of course, we will continue to pay ridiculously large sums for a filet mignon). As to pork, well, we just close our eyes, chew and try not to think of Babe. And corn (which is basically distilled oil from a farmer’s point of view due to the heavy fertilizing it needs), is our very favorite vegetable, even if most of don’t know about it. It is used for, and in, almost everything including pop soda, hamburger buns and in meat, too, via feed.

But for the next generation, things will probably be different. In fact, they will have to be different, for at least two reasons.

 

Some more Earth, anyone?

One, there is simply not enough planet. Even if population growth continues to slow in billion-people countries such as China and India due to economic development, humanity is projected to reach 9.5-10 billion people by 2050, almost 40% more than today’s population. We will need more food, a lot more.

According to some calculations, today’s farmlands would add up to a landmass the size of South America. For the world to be able to feed us our diet of plants in 2050 using our current technologies, we would need to find new arable land the size of Brazil. As for meat, well, the UN estimates that our take-up of meat will rise by about 70% by 2050. The bad news is that we would not be able do this even if we turned all of our farmland into pastures.

Two, feeding us adds is killing us through climate change, too. A quarter of our greenhouse gas emissions derive from agriculture, land use and biomass burning. Meanwhile, the changing climate could easily decrease yields because of the bad weather it causes (more CO2, by itself, can increase yields). If lifestock had to be increased, greenhouse gas emissions would be much much higher, as currently 18% of all emissions is connected to making meat for hungry humans.

So things are bound to change, as they have in the past when similar worries of overpopulation were resolved, usually by technological advances. So what could constitute such advances? And, most importantly, how will it change the taste of our food?

 

Yielding to GMOs

Precisely what we eat is sure to change. Farming yields will increase as billions of dollars flow into R&D. New genetically engineered plants will be born and patented: some resistant to pests or herbicides used to get rid of weeds, others taking water-shortage extremely well. While there is a lot of debate about whether current GMOs are safe or effective, this new technology will surely take the usual path for radically new technologies. We will be frightened of food genetically stiched together from other organisms, the way 19th century railroaders were (also justly) frightened of big steam-engines that initially sometimes went caboom. Similarly, there are sure to be GMO-fiascos where unexpected side-effects cause griveous harm to persons or the ecosystem. But sooner or later, the details of the technology will be ironed out, and it will become mainstream. After all, it is to agriculture what engines were to mobility.

Let’s just hope that the plants’ taste does not suffer like it did with the globalization of fruit trade, where fruits are picked green and stuck into ethanol gas to “ripen”, a process where the end-result might look very similar to a sun-ripened fruit, but the taste is merely a shade of what it would be, had it been left on the tree to convert sunlight into various sugars and tasty molecules.

 

Growing in cities

This is incidentally another thing that might change, should a very interesting idea called vertical farming gain traction. Vertical farming, an idea propagated by Dickson Despommier, a professor at Columbia University who would take farming back inside the cities. He envisions huge skyscrapers of what are basically plant production plants where cereals and vegetables are grown in controlled environments. And of course, if the environment is controlled, you can grow anything the market wants, be it cucumbers, wheat, seaweed or bananas. Light, temperature, nutrients would all be modulated with scientific precision in hydroponic or aeroponic environments.

The latter basically means that plants are not planted in soil at all, but grow in a nutrient-filled steam and soak up everything they need from it. Hydroponics, which is a lot less scary, is now an 80-year old technology, and it already in use as a large-scale technology in for example at the 318-acre Eurofresh Farms in Arizona. Plants are basically held in place and nutrient-filled water is circulated over their roots.

„Crops can be produced year-round, droughts and floods that often ruin entire harvests avoided, yields are maximized because of ideal growing and ripening conditions and human pathogens are minimized,” Despommier writes in a recent article.

He argues that vertical farming would not just provide enough – and local, and perfectly ripe, and high-quality, and varied – food, it would also help out in the green department by cutting transport emissions and freeing up farmland for reforestation.

Chicago might be the first city to build such a farm, as detailed plans for it are being crafted now by the University of Illinois, but several metropolises from all over the world have shown interest

Szólj hozzá!

Finding a good pairing is difficult in life, business and of course, food. First of all, there are so many ways to fit together (or not); opposites attract, similarities comfort and a good complement to who and what you are renders the team the most capable. Then there is the fact that any fit can be judged differently by different people. Are you a perfectionist? Then you will also have to struggle with the temptation to try to find the elusive ideal, when 2+2 does equal 5.

Common wisdom says one such ideal pairing is food and wine. Not all foods and all wines, of course. As any foodie will tell you, red wines and seafood don’t mix, while delicate whites are easily overpowered by a medium rare steak. And a good sliver of camembert will usually smooth out any cabernet. But beyond the obvious no-nos, most sommeliers see food-wine pairing as more of an art than a science, with no hard and fast rules.

 

Do they have chemistry?

Well, no longer. It seems science is pushing itself to the front again. (Diluted wine with meals originally served a sanitary purpose: to disinfect meat gone slightly bad from a lack of refrigeration.) Japanese scientists have in October published results explaining why some red wines do work with seafood: if a red does not have iron in it, then the fishy aftertaste of a bad bordeax-bream pairing can be avoided. If even trace amounts are added to any wine while dining on scallops, voilá, a terrible meal.

It also turns out that combining red wines and red meat is not only good, but also good for you. Red wines containg polyphenols, powerful antioxidants that are not absorbed by the body easily. Meanwhile, the digestion of fat-rich red meat produces two byproducts (malondialdehyde and hydroperoxide) which are toxic to cells. However, when you have both in your stomach, it acts as a bioreactor where polyphenols are not only capable of binding free radicals but killing toxic stuff as well, american scientists found.

And it is not just the scientists, but chefs as well. Enlisting scientific methods and chemistry labs in the search for perfect flavor-combinations has been around for a while. Molecular gastronomists like Ferran Adrià of El Bulli in Spain and others analyse the flavor compounds of food and use the results to mix them in surprising combinations based on the two foods sharing a flavor-compound. Celebrity chef Heston Blumenthal of the British restaurant Fat Duck discovered, for example, that white chocolate and caviar have a compound in common: trimethylamine. Carrot and violet should go because both have ionone. Oyster and kiwi share methyl hexanoate. Coffee might make a good substitute for broth as it also has 2-furfurylthiol and 2-methyl-3-furanethiol. Liven and jasmine, yum.

 

The science of drinking

But this year, the search for perfect matches is encreasingly including beverages. Heston Blumenthal is researching how the drink of British grandmothers, sherry complements foods. Together with Professor Don Mottram of Reading University, he found that dry sherries hold a group of compounds known as diketopiperazines (DKPs) that can accentuate and carry the taste of some umami-rich foods such as shitake mushrooms and Parmesan cheese. (Umami is the fifth taste beside sweet, sour, salty and bitter. It is also known as savoury.) For instance, eugenol was found in both Fino Sherry and cloves, making them a match. “One of the big revelations was trying an Amontillado with peach and it seemed to be that the Sherry made the peach more peach-like, which is amazing,” Blumenthal commented to a journalist.

A Canadian sommelier of 20 years is quickly reaching superstar status in the molecular gastronomy world due to his scientific investigation of wine-food pairings. His book Papilles et molécules (Tastebuds and Molecules), published in the summer, received heady accolade from Adrià himself (who has, incidentally introduced a beer to go with food). Adrià praised it as “a paramount work, the foundation stone, the first step into a new world that is now open wide in all its splendour to those who love gastronomy.” François Chartier also mostly uses similarity as the basis for pairings, leading to combinations such as oak-aged wines with pork, traditionally linked up with fruity reds and rosemary with moscato, riesling and gewurztraminer, which are seldom paired at all.

One food-wine pairing I liked in Budapest was Philippe of Philippe Le Belge Restaurant and Sára Matolcsy, head of Etyeki Kúria Winery. It was a combination of known factors: the former is one of the more innovative French restaurants in Budapest, while the latter happens to be my favourite winery in Hungary. The menu had six wines to go with eight dishes with interesting combinations such as Chinese prawns in beer-batter with a pinot noir osé. Auvergne blue cheese, which usually takes a sticky-sweet red such as a port or a madeira was paired with a chardonnay, which made me happy.

 

Szólj hozzá!

 

Mass hunger was banished from Hungary only in the middle of the last century. Until then, a bad harvest could kill hundreds and thousands in the less developed parts of the country – southeast, in the Alföld and northeast in tiny mountain villages. In fact, abolishing mass hunger was one of the true achievements of communism – per capita GDP rose in the burst of quick growth spurred by rebirth of international trade behind the Iron Curtain and this gain was, to a never before seen extent, truly redistributed in the end of the 50s, beginning of the 60s.

And amid all this shiny new hope and uncharacteristic optimism, Hungarian comfort food was born. It wasn’t fancy stuff. It was, after all, adapted to life in a partly industrialized agrarian society. And physical work requires a vast amount of calories that are the easiest to deliver with a plateload of potatoes with a huge dollop of fat, preferably lard and/or sour cream. It also followed the logic of human biology – with carbs to make you happy and some fat to make it taste good. 

Simple, hearty fare was also an ideological issue – anything out of line with traditional farmers’ fare was considered bourgeois affectation. (This of course, did not extend party leaders here and abroad, which is easy to discern in view of the fact that whole generations of cows were born, chopped up and sold without any filet mignon reaching the markets.)

In the industrialized cuisine of socialist era, niche vegetables previously widespread in gardens such as artichokes, rhubarb and chard disappeared altogether. Vegetable farming was limited to these: potatoes, tomatoes, paprika, cauliflower, kohlrabi (German turnip or karalábé), carrots and parsley root, tree types of cabbage (red, Savoy and Bulgarian), onions and garlic.

So I always wonder that so many dishes were compiled of so few ingredients. Paprikás krumpli, which was originally shepherds’ food and cooked in a cauldron, starts out with a chunk of diced bacon, some sautéed onions, some kolbász, preferably of the lángolt type to give it some protein, a spoonful of the omnipresent paprika, some water, and potatoes to give it bulk.

Krumplis tészta, the perfect meal for lonely people without much patience for cooking (shepherds, again), is pasta squares with paprika, cooked potatoes, pepper, and bacon.

Túrós csusza is even easier: just cook the pasta squares, and sprinkle cottage cheese, sour cream and fried bacon bits on top. (There are ways to make this more complicated, and taste even better, though. E.g. coating the pasta with the fat from the bacon and sticking it all in the oven to make it crackle a bit.) This however, is special in the sense that this is the only Hungarian home-cooked comfort food that makes it onto restaurant menus, so it is the simplest to try.

Tojásos galuska, where home-made pasta with an overdose of eggs is cooked, drained, then mixed in with some yes, you guessed it, dices of fried bacon and eggs. This dish is always accompanied by some salad lettuce sunk in vinegary-sugary water.

My personal favorite is a slightly more complicated dish called rakott krumpli, which is in fact a bucolically bastardized version of a gratin dauphinoise.

The latter is an elegantly minimalist concoction of paper-thin potatoes, rich cream and garlic. However, the inventors of rakott krumpli obviously felt it that it was lacking in some respects. First of all, who wants to bother with grating potatoes, lets just cook them in their skins, making it easy to peel them when they cool a bit. And no potato slices should be less than half a centimeter thick, it wouldn’t fill you up if it was. You definitely need some protein, maybe preserved meat and eggs in it, and a touch of paprika, hm, let’s slice in some kolbász as well. And let’s use some 20-30% fat sour cream instead of crème fraîche, it’s cheaper and easier to keep. Maybe some bacon? Slice it all up and shove it in an oven, bake it at high heat and voila, now that is what a potato dish should be like! None of your dainty airs now!

And truly, made well, the potatoes become creamy from all the fat, the kolbász adds a complicated but familiar “Hungarian” taste and the eggs soak it all up and add a variation of texture without making it all heavy. So if you are ever invited to dinner by a Hungarian family, beg them to eat the fois gras without you and just make you some authentic rakott krumpli with pickles cucumbers (csemegeuborka).

Szólj hozzá!

Lillies look pretty, smell nice, and are much more complicated beings than you or me, if the amount of DNA we have is any indication. As a matter of fact, the genome of lilies is ten times that of humans. A tenth of the tiger lily’s natural blueprint is enough to describe  a being capable of building the Eiffel tower and going to the Moon. And what can the lily do? Well, as I said before – look pretty and smell nice. All that DNA to detail how it should do that...

Which is why I think that experiencing that complexity, i.e. eating (the edible species of) lilies is definitely a culinary adventure worth taking, especially as tiger lilies are only one of several hundred edible flowers – many of which are traditional fixtures in the kitchen. Lavender and chamomile are known to be excellent with red meat dishes, while jasmine and rose petals are traditional dessert flavors in many cuisines. (Turkish delights, anyone?) Saffron and nutmeg flowers are used in basic Mediterranean food such as béchamel sauce. Several flowers’ heads are disguised in supermarkets as vegetables – artichokes, broccoli, cauliflowers, to name a few, although young sunflowers are also said to be great steamed. Most of the flowers of well-known herbs such as basil or rosemary contain all of the essential oils of the leaves but remain a bit more delicate in taste, ideal for salads. Courgette flowers have been stuffed in Italy since, well, since courgettes were called zucchinis.

However, until this new rage for food broke out in the past couple of decades, the use of flowers in food was pretty much limited to the above despite some interest on behalf of consumers. In fact, in a 1966 Michigan study, Garden day participants and professional chefs were asked to rate violas, borage flowers and nasturtiums on whether they found them appealing or not as food – astonishingly, chefs were less likely to find them exciting than potential consumers.

All that has changed though, with many top-notch chefs experimenting with all sort of flowers. The renown Catalan restaurant El Bulli served tangerine flower concentrate and rose foam, while flowers are also used as a sort of palate cleanser between bites of for example, oysters. The experimental kitchen of Mugaritz serves bonito from the Bay of Biscay over sea chamomile and coastal herbs. In fact, the art of serving flowers is now almost mainstream, with several good thematic cookbooks and guides.

Fortunately, Budapest is also capable of satisfying your craving for acacia or marigold with a three-month old bistro even taking flower-cuisine for its name. Flores Bistro on the Belgrád rakpart on the Pest bank of the Danube is quickly establishing itself as the provider of one of the best value meals in town that will suit the gourmet without bankrupting him or her, right up there with Csalogány 26, Olimpia and Klassz. Flores’ speciality, as its name indicates, are flowers and herbs, with signature dishes such as the lavender pork chops with parsley-root purée and grilled peaches (lovely) and the duck liver pâté with lilac foam. As the owner who sometimes puts on the chef’s hat will tell you, spices are used sparingly, because the flavors of the ingredients and creativity in combining them are expected to fill in for borrowed piquancy.

Szólj hozzá!

After a couple of hundred years of Asian-inspired spicy gulyás-cooking (which was allegedly flavored with ginger and tons of cayenne pepper before paprika was imported during the Ottoman occupation) democracy when everyone who was anyone ate pretty much the same dishes with varying amounts of meat, Hungary turned towards feudalism and international cuisine.

Indeed, the two sometimes entered into a causal relationship: the kitchen was important enough to merit the giving of lands and nobility, as many Hungarian towns with “szakácsi” in their names such as Kisszakácsi demonstrates.
Renown king Mátyás, who gained the epitaph “Fair” not for his appearance but for his decisions, did have a preference for Hungarian food, but that was interesting enough to be remarked upon by travelers. His wife, Italian Beatrice also brought Mediterranean flavor to his court for example by serving peacock-meat.
Miklós Zrinyi, a well-known poet and military strategist even imported a copy of a papal cookbook from the Vatican published in 1643, composed by famous Bartolomeo Scappi. Roux, the French flour-and-fat base used in soups and vegetable stews, also began its march to proliferation in Hungary sometime in the 17th century. And foreign cuisine’s influence was not limited to recipes – even food was imported. As a poem written by Pál Kőszeghy about a 1695 wedding shows, even the lesser nobility partied in cosmopolitan style: seafish – including dolphin and whale-meat – as well as live oysters were imported from the Atlantic Ocean (!) in ice-filled vats drawn by horses.
The globalization of the 19th century further immersed well-to-do kitchens into French cooking with kitchen jargon en français and dishes just comme ça. A 1914 cookbook by Mariska Vízvári, celebrated actress turned scandal-hounded hostess to the elite makes plain that party food pretty much consisted of what you would expect today if someone was putting on a show: lots of foie gras, salmon and caviar, dips, sauces and intricately prepared vegetables to go with huge hunks of red meat.
But today, haute cuisine is notable absent from most castles, most of which are now serving as fancy or not so fancy hotels. What you usually get in these three-five star establishments is high quality and expensive, but just no longer top-notch in the international culinary scene. Château Visz, Ferenc Tolvaly’s kastély just south of Lake Balaton, where a Michelin-star chef from Austria, Eric Schröter holds court (reserve well ahead) is of course a notable exception, but the only one I know of.
However, you could also go to for example the Szent Gaál Kastély near Szekszárd (which is more a villa than a castle with its 7 rooms) and just enjoy your meal for what it is: a good dinner prepared with enough loving care by the caretaker himself you ask for the recipes.

Szólj hozzá!

 

If you take a good long look at it, what you are getting is usually 80% air. And the rest is very basic stuff as well: water, flour, maybe a tad of sugar and a peck of salt, and that’s it. So it sort of staggers my mind that these very basic ingredients can form pitas, chapatis (Indian flatbread), bannocks, (Scottish oat cakes), shaobings (parchment thin Chinese wrappers), lavash (yummy Armenian bread), pretzels, pizza dough, baladi (Egyptian “pocket bread”), bagels and pumpernickel (rye bread), baguettes and mantou (Chinese steamed bread), all so very distinguishable from each other.

Especially since what happens inside the bread is always basically the same: the gigantic proteins in the flour are encouraged to sort themselves out by introducing air bubbles to break the protein strands into more manageable bits and kneading to align them. Then these bubbles are enlarged by the introduction of gases usually produced by a fungus (baker’s yeast or simply collecting the yeast that float around in the air by presenting an attractive watery-floury foodbowl for them, also known as a leaven). Eventually heat is used to get rid of the water that makes all this molecular stretching and sliding around possible, firming the bread, and there you have it, you have a tortilla, a kifli or a biscotti.

Yet maybe it is precisely this sparsity of ingredients that allows kitchen chemistry to be its most inventive: take two or maybe three ingredients and see what you can do with it.

So why don’t you try it? Waking up to the smell of baking bread wafting is something no-one should miss out on.

And if concocting your own experiment is not your thing, you can have the smell without the fuss by getting some par-baked bread you just have to pop in the oven. Some commercial versions are good (try Győri Sütöde’s ciabatta), but if you want a treat, go for the organic French croissants and München brezels, available for take-away at Intercontinental.

 

Szólj hozzá!

 

You know, you really should get out of the city more often. If you live in Budapest, as I do, the relatively pristine forests of the Pilis mountains are just half an hours’ drive away. I am not telling you to do this in order to view our mud-colored old Danube twisting around Visegrád or to hike up to the almost 700 m high Prédikátorszék (Preacher’s Point) through the geological kaleidoscope of Vadállókövek (rocks of vulcanic origin). Not that these are not all very worthy goals of a trip. But for me, the woods are all about food.

But as I walk the trails near Királykút (King’s Spring) or on meadows close to Visegrád, I scan the undergrowth for the telltale signs of edible berries, mushrooms or clumps of wild garlic, the leaves of which happen to make a great salad if you combine them with a bit of blue cheese and some sun-dried tomatoes. (It’s a bit late for wild garlic now as they grow at the end of spring, but you might still find some high in the Alps.)

But my favorites are wild strawberries and raspberries. As small as the nail on your pinky, they are a bit difficult to discover, you have to keep an eye out for their angular leaves. But if you do manage to find them, prepare yourself for an intense burst of sunshine on your tongue that will make food industry experts who concoct “forest fruit” flavors seem the clumsy henchmen they are. Unfortunately, the berries are often amidst huge patches of nettles, but hey, you can’t have everything.

Wild strawberries adapt themselves well to all sorts of habitats with sunshine, so you can find them in meadows as well. If you do, then you just might be lucky enough to use them as indicators to pick one of the most wide-spread and delicious mushrooms in Hungary, Marasmius oreades or szegfűgomba (a.k.a. fairy ring mushrooms). They are relatively easy to recognize: they grow in circular clumps in the grass after rain. Their hats are white from both above and below and have small indentations all around. But please don’t pick any mushrooms you are not 100% certain of, and even if you are, take them to Vásárcsarnok, where mycologists will look them over for free – poisoning yourself is so stupid.

Mushrooms always pose questions of life and death. First of all, many of them eat cadavers, which is a bit disturbing (the rest, the “vegetarian” mushrooms live in peaceful symbiosis with certain plants’ roots). But if they weren’t there to break down organic material, life would have long ago run out of building blocks. So they are in fact the cleaning crew after all of us plants and animals who ultimately draw our energy from sunshine. Oh, and some mushrooms can eat petrochemicals as well, a digestive capability which only a few bacteria could rival.

Szegfűgomba has another trick up its sleeve. It can revive itself after completely drying out. This is not just rehydration, it starts to breathe again after having stopped. (It has something to do with a sugar its cells contain, but we don’t know what exactly.) How is that for weird?

But the weird goes on: they are huge, often even several kilometers wide, and decades or centuries old – yet invisible. We don’t know why, where or when the strands of mushroom, the hyphae bring forth their visible fruit, the stuff we eat. It has something to do with rain.

So don’t be surprised if you do not manage to find any after trekking in the Pilis for hours. I have the perfect consolation for your growling stomach: a home-cooked meal of Hungarian comfort food at Kis Rigó in Pilisszentlászló.

Szólj hozzá!

An Australian barbecue leads our undercover culinary columnist to rediscover her carnivorous instincts.

 

You don’t have to go back very far to understand the human species’ infatuation with meat. Just about 100,000 years. That’s when cave-paintings first show our ancestors actively hunting, after about 2 million years of scavenging carcasses left by predators. The spread of hunting changed everything for us. It allowed Homo Sapiens to leave its cradle in Africa and move to the then icy Europe and North America, where plants were scarce. According to some speculations, it also made us smarter as it would have been impossible to sustain our large brains without the calorie- and nutrient-packed fat and muscle (flesh) of animals.

It is easy to see the significance of meat when you look at how people did without it in the first grain-based agrarian societies of the Middle East. The first farmers were scrawny and disease-ridden while less “advanced” hunters were strong, healthy and a   stately 6-feet in height. Our taste buds also lead us to consume meat as raw meat triggers our receptors for essential salts, sugars, amino acids and nucleotides because muscle cells break apart more easily than starchy plants’ when chewing.

I’m telling you all this because I found myself thinking of how we are evolutionarily preconditioned to love meat and maybe African herbivores in particular when I found out that the most succulent meat I have ever tasted came from a gnu (a.k.a wildebeest). It was juicier, tastier than the very best fillet mignons I have ever had. If you prefer your steak well-done, then the gnu is not for you, but if you don’t like to saw through your meat then you simply have to try it.

 

 

 

 

Photo: Bence Kollányi

 

I had it at the Budapest Kempinski Hotel Corvinus’ terrace grill bar, where this summer’s theme is the Australian Barbecue (HUF 6,000, excluding drinks, every Thursday from 7 p.m.) The culinary experience turned out to be well worth the price, especially since the gnu was not the only exotic meat: we chewed our way through kangaroo (very tasty), ostrich (a bit too like chicken for me) and crocodile meat.

The crocodile also made me think of evolution. It tastes a bit like Hungarian fish harcsa and a bit like nothing I’ve ever tasted before. It found myself conjuring pictures of lazy crocodiles slowly submerging themselves into muddy water and laying low in the muck waiting for prey. If no-one told you what it was, you would still know that you were eating something dangerous, something that could eat you if you didn’t eat it first.

Now, I’m a girl and a dedicated omnivore, so I don’t normally get a kick out of the fact that I’m eating animals that used to live (I just like the meat), but even I felt – a bit disturbingly, in fact – a primordial rush cutting up the crocodile. As if I had bested the enemy and then proceeded to viciously and revengefully, yet still respectfully, eat him.

I guess meat really is about our fight to survive.

Szólj hozzá!

süti beállítások módosítása